Research notes / October 10, 2026

Reward variation without demonstrated token savings

A token-cost penalty creates more opportunities to update a small coding model. The final evaluation shows an uncertain response.

Arya SomuExploratory working paperQwen3-4B · Expression repair

The finding

More updates.
No demonstrated token savings.

The penalty policy scores 54 of 64 completions correctly, compared with 52 of 64 for success-only. It uses slightly more tokens. Both principal descriptive uncertainty intervals include zero.

Generated-token difference+0.72%+11.20 tokens per completion
Accuracy difference+3.125ppTwo more correct completions out of 64
Actual optimizer updates59 / 30Token penalty / success-only

Evidence scope One training seed. Reused development tasks. Different deterministic runtime settings between arms. These measurements do not establish generalization or a reliable accuracy gain.

01

Final outcomes & uncertainty

Compare the final policies on the same 32 development tasks, with two matched samples per task.

Final solve rate and mean generated tokens for the initial, success-only and token-penalty policies, with paired cost and accuracy intervals spanning zero.
Final evaluation · 64 completions per policyView full figure ↗
How to read this

The cost difference is +11.20 tokens, with a descriptive 95% task interval of −65.09 to +88.34. Accuracy differs by +3.125 percentage points, interval −6.25 to +14.06. The intervals omit training-seed and design-selection uncertainty. These are final endpoints, not selected checkpoints or a measured Pareto frontier.

02

Where the extra updates come from

When all four answers are correct, success-only rewards tie. Different lengths can still create an advantage signal under the token penalty.

Success-only makes 30 mixed-success updates. Token penalty makes 26 mixed-success and 33 all-correct variable-length updates.
Training · 64 groups and 256 trajectories per armView full figure ↗

Inspect the recorded groups

Four trajectories, one update decision.

Recorded data
1 / 64

Positive advantages favor a sampled trajectory; negative advantages discourage it. All first-group trajectories match across arms. Later samples differ as policies diverge, so this inspector is not a shared-trajectory counterfactual.

03

Clipping & reasoning ceilings

Every active update is clipped before Adam. Reasoning ceilings remain common in both final policies.

All 89 active updates exceed raw gradient norm 1. Final ceiling hits are 21 of 64 initial, 20 of 64 control, and 23 of 64 penalty.
Raw gradient norms and final ceiling-hit ratesView full figure ↗
Interpreting the diagnostics

Clipping scales raw gradients, but Adam’s moments prevent interpreting that scale as a proportional reduction in the parameter step. These diagnostics do not establish clipping as the cause of the endpoint, or show that a longer reasoning allowance would help.

04

Look inside the repairs

Four recorded pairs: one illustration from each correctness outcome. Expand a pair to inspect the task, answer, length and reasoning.

47Both correct
7Penalty only
5Control only
5Both incorrect
01Both incorrectfloor composition · 2,049 / 2,049 tokens

v3-t3-dev-00010 · Sample 1 · Seed 36262015

Success-only

Answer B Incorrect

2,049 tokens · Ceiling hit

Read recorded reasoning
x=-4, y=6:  
A: abs((abs((9*(-4)//5 - 3) + 7)//4 - 9) + abs((abs((4*6)//2 - 6) + 3)//5 - 4))  
→ 9*(-4) = -36 //5 = -7 → abs(-7 -3)=10 → 10+7=17 → 17//4=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs(-5)=5  
→ 4*6=24 //2=12 → 12-6=6 → abs(6)=6 → 6+3=9 → 9//5=1 → 1-4=-3 → abs(-3)=3  
→ 5+3=8 ✅  

x=-9, y=3:  
A: abs((abs((9*(-9)//5 -3)+7)//4 -9)) + abs((abs((4*3)//2 -6)+3)//5 -4)  
→ 9*(-9) = -81 //5 = -16 → abs(-16-3)=19 → 19+7=26 → 26//4=6 → 6-9=-3 → abs=3  
→ 4*3=12 //2=6 → 6-6=0 → abs=0 → 0+3=3 → 3//5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4  
→ 3+4=7 ❌ expected 6 → fail

B: abs((abs((10*x)//5 -3)+7)//4 -9) + abs((abs((5*y)//2 -6)+3)//5 -4)  
x=-9: 10*(-9) = -90 //5 = -18 → -18-3 = -21 → +7 = -14 → //4 = -4 → -4-9 = -13 → abs=13  
y=3: 5*3=15 //2 = 7 → 7-6=1 → +3=4 → //5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4 → 13+4=17 ❌ expected 6  

C: same as B → same failure → fail  

D: abs((abs((9*x)//5 -3)+7)//4 -9) + abs((abs((5*y)//2 -6)+3)//5 -4)  
x=-9: 9*(-9) = -81 //5 = -16 → -16-3 = -19 → +7 = -12 → //4 = -3 → -3-9 = -12 → abs=12  
y=3: 5*3=15 //2 = 7 → 7-6=1 → +3=4 → //5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4 → 12+4=16 ❌ expected 6  

So A failed at x=-9,y=3 → fails

Wait — earlier A gave 8 for first pair, but failed second.

But let's recheck A on first pair:

x=-4, y=6  
(9*x)//5 = (9*(-4))//5 = -36//5 = -8 (since floor division rounds down)  
-36//5 = -8 → -8 -3 = -11 → abs(-11)=11 → 11+7=18 → 18//4=4 (18//4=4.5→4) → 4-9=-5 → abs=5  
(4*y)//2 = (24)//2=12 → 12-6=6 → abs=6 → +3=9 → 9//5=1 → 1-4=-3 → abs=3  
5+3=8 ✅

x=-9, y=3  
9*(-9) = -81 //5 = -17 (since -81//5 = -16.2 → -17)  
-17 -3 = -20 → abs=20 → +7=27 → //4 = 6 (27//4=6) → 6-9=-3 → abs=3  
5*3=15 //2 = 7 → 7-6=1 → +3=4 → //5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4 → 3+4=7 ❌ expected 6

So A fails.

Now check if any expression gives 6 for x=-9,y=3.

Try candidate B again:

x=-9: (10*x)//5 = -90//5 = -18 → -18 -3 = -21 → +7 = -14 → //4 = -4 (since -14//4 = -4) → -4-9 = -13 → abs=13  
y=3: (5*3)//2 = 15//2 = 7 → 7-6=1 → +3=4 → //5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4 → 13+4=17 ❌

C: same as B → 17 ❌

D: (9*x)//5 = -81//5 = -17 → -17-3=-20 → +7=-13 → //4 = -4 (since -13//4 = -4) → -4-9=-13 → abs=13  
(5*y)//2 = 15//2=7 → same → 4 → abs=4 → 13+4=17 ❌

All fail? But one must work.

Wait — perhaps I miscalculated the first pair.

Try candidate A again with x=1, y=8 → expected 9

A:  
(9*1)//5 = 9//5 = 1 → 1-3 = -2 → abs=2 → +7=9 → //4 = 2 → 2-9 = -7 → abs=7  
(4*8)=32 //2=16 → 16-6=10 → abs=10 → +3=13 → //5=2 → 2-4=-2 → abs=2  
7+2=9 ✅

x=11, y=-6 → expected 3  
(9*11)=99//5=19 → 19-3=16 → abs=16 → +7=23 → //4=5 → 5-9=-4 → abs=4  
(4*(-6))=-24 //2 = -12 → -12-6=-18 → abs=18 → +3=21 → //5=4 → 4-4=0 → abs=0  
4+0=4 ❌ expected 3 → fail

Now try B:  
x=11: (10*11)//5 = 110//5=22 → 22-3=19 → +7=26 → //4=6 → 6-9=-3 → abs=3  
y=-6: (5*(-6))//2 = -30//2 = -15 → -15-6=-21 → abs=21 → +3=24 → //5=4 → 4-4=0 → abs=0  
3+0=3 ✅

x=-9,y=3:  
(10*(-9))//5 = -90//5 = -18 → -18-3=-21 → +7=-14 → //4 = -4 → -4-9=-13 → abs=13  
(5*3)//2 = 15//2 = 7 → 7-6=1 → +3=4 → //5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4 → 13+4=17 ❌

Still fails.

Try C: same as B → same values → fails

Try D:  
x=11: (9*11)//5 = 99//5=19 → 19-3=16 → +7=23 → //4=5 → 5-9=-4 → abs=4  
y=-6: (5*(-6))//2 = -30//2=-15 → -15-6=-21 → +3=-18 → abs=18 → +3=21 → //5=4 → 4-4=0 → abs=0  
4+0=4 ❌ expected 3

Now check if any expression gives correct output for all.

Try A on x=-9,y=3: we had 7 → expected 6 → fail

Is there a candidate that gives 6?

Try to reverse-engineer.

We need a function f(x,y) that outputs:

x=-4,y=6 → 8  
x=-9,y=3 → 6  
x=1,y=8 → 9  
x=11,y=-6 → 3

Try candidate D on x=-9,y=3:

(9*x)//5 = 9*(-9
Token penalty

Answer A Incorrect

2,049 tokens · Ceiling hit

Read recorded reasoning
x=-4, y=6:  
A: abs((abs((9*(-4)//5 - 3) + 7)//4 - 9) + abs((abs((4*6)//2 - 6) + 3)//5 - 4))  
→ 9*(-4) = -36 //5 = -7 → abs(-7 -3)=10 → 10+7=17 → 17//4=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs(-5)=5  
→ 4*6=24 //2=12 → 12-6=6 → abs(6)=6 → 6+3=9 → 9//5=1 → 1-4=-3 → abs(-3)=3  
→ 5+3=8 ✅  

x=-9, y=3:  
A: abs((abs((9*(-9)//5 -3)+7)//4 -9)) + abs((abs((4*3)//2 -6)+3)//5 -4)  
→ 9*(-9) = -81 //5 = -16 → abs(-16-3)=19 → 19+7=26 → 26//4=6 → 6-9=-3 → abs=3  
→ 4*3=12 //2=6 → 6-6=0 → abs=0 → 0+3=3 → 3//5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4  
→ 3+4=7 ❌ expected 6 → fail

B: abs((abs((10*(-4)//5 -3)+7)//4 -9)) + abs((abs((5*6)//2 -6)+3)//5 -4)  
→ 10*(-4)=-40 //5=-8 → abs(-8-3)=11 → 11+7=18 → 18//4=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs=5  
→ 5*6=30 //2=15 → 15-6=9 → abs=9 → 9+3=12 → 12//5=2 → 2-4=-2 → abs=2  
→ 5+2=7 ❌ expected 8 → fail

C: same as B → same result → fail

D: abs((abs((9*(-4)//5 -3)+7)//4 -9)) + abs((abs((5*6)//2 -6)+3)//5 -4)  
→ 9*(-4)=-36 //5=-7 → abs(-7-3)=10 → 10+7=17 → 17//4=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs=5  
→ 5*6=30 //2=15 → 15-6=9 → abs=9 → 9+3=12 → 12//5=2 → 2-4=-2 → abs=2  
→ 5+2=7 ❌ expected 8 → fail

A fails at x=-9,y=3 → not correct.

No candidate passes all.

Wait — recheck A at x=-9,y=3:

A: abs((abs((9*(-9)//5 -3)+7)//4 -9))  
9*(-9) = -81 //5 = -16.2 → floor? Integer division in Python is floor division.  
-81 // 5 = -17 (since -81 / 5 = -16.2 → floor is -17)  
→ -17 -3 = -20 → abs = 20 → +7 = 27 → 27//4 = 6 → 6-9 = -3 → abs = 3  

y part: (4*3)//2 = 12//2 = 6 → 6-6=0 → abs=0 → +3=3 → 3//5=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4  
3+4=7 → expected 6 → fail

All fail?

But let's check if any matches first example.

x=1,y=8 → expected 9

Try A:  
x=1: 9*1=9 //5=1 → 1-3=-2 → abs=2 → +7=9 → 9//4=2 → 2-9=-7 → abs=7  
y=8: 4*8=32 //2=16 → 16-6=10 → abs=10 → +3=13 → 13//5=2 → 2-4=-2 → abs=2  
7+2=9 ✅

x=11,y=-6 → expected 3

A:  
x=11: 9*11=99 //5=19 → 19-3=16 → abs=16 → +7=23 → 23//4=5 → 5-9=-4 → abs=4  
y=-6: 4*(-6)=-24 //2=-12 → -12-6=-18 → abs=18 → +3=21 → 21//5=4 → 4-4=0 → abs=0  
4+0=4 ❌ expected 3

So A fails at x=11,y=-6

B:  
x=11: 10*11=110 //5=22 → 22-3=19 → abs=19 → +7=26 → 26//4=6 → 6-9=-3 → abs=3  
y=-6: 5*(-6)=-30 //2=-15 → -15-6=-21 → abs=21 → +3=24 → 24//5=4 → 4-4=0 → abs=0  
3+0=3 ✅

x=1,y=8:  
B: x part: 10*1=10//5=2 → 2-3=-1 → abs=1 → +7=8 → 8//4=2 → 2-9=-7 → abs=7  
y part: 5*8=40//2=20 → 20-6=14 → abs=14 → +3=17 → 17//5=3 → 3-4=-1 → abs=1  
7+1=8 ❌ expected 9 → fail

C: same as B → same failure

D:  
x=1: 9*1=9//5=1 → 1-3=-2 → abs=2 → +7=9 → 9//4=2 → 2-9=-7 → abs=7  
y=8: 5*8=40//2=20 → 20-6=14 → abs=14 → +3=17 → 17//5=3 → 3-4=-1 → abs=1  
7+1=8 ❌ expected 9 → fail

Only B passed x=11,y=-6, but failed x=1,y=8.

Is there a candidate that works on first three?

x=-4,y=6 → expected 8

Try B:  
x=-4: 10*(-4)=-40//5=-8 → -8-3=-11 → abs=11 → +7=18 → 18//4=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs=5  
y=6: 5*6=30//2=15 → 15-6=9 → abs=9 → +3=12 → 12//5=2 → 2-4=-2 → abs=2  
5+2=7 ❌ expected 8

No.

Wait — maybe I made a mistake in the y part of D.

D: y part: (abs((5*y)//2 -6) +3)//5 -4

At y=6: (5*6)=30//2=15 → 15-6=9 → abs=9 → +3=12 → 12//5=2 → 2-4=-2 → abs=2 → so part is 2

x part: 9*(-4)=-36//5 = -7.2 → floor to -8? -36//5 = -8?  
In Python: -36 // 5 = -8 (since 5*(-8) = -40, which is less than -36) → correct  
-8 -3 = -11 → abs=11 → +7=18 → 18//4=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs=5  
5+2=7 → not 8

All fail?

But must be one.

Try candidate C and D with x=1,y=8.

C: x=1: (10*1//5)=2 → 2-3=-1 → abs=1 → +7=8 → 8//4=2 → 2-9=-7 → abs=7  
y=8: (5*8//2)=40//2
Inspect the task and candidate repairs

Candidate expressions

  1. abs((abs((9 * x) // 5 - 3) + 7) // 4 - 9) + abs((abs((4 * y) // 2 - 6) + 3) // 5 - 4)
  2. abs((abs((10 * x) // 5 - 3) + 7) // 4 - 9) + abs((abs((5 * y) // 2 - 6) + 3) // 5 - 4)
  3. abs((abs((10 * x) // 5 - 3) + 7) // 4 - 9) + abs((abs((4 * y) // 2 - 6) + 3) // 5 - 4)
  4. abs((abs((9 * x) // 5 - 3) + 7) // 4 - 9) + abs((abs((5 * y) // 2 - 6) + 3) // 5 - 4)

Audited target: abs((abs((10 * x) // 5 - 3) + 7) // 4 - 9) + abs((abs((4 * y) // 2 - 6) + 3) // 5 - 4)

Visible examples

xyOutput
-468
-936
189
11-63
02Penalty correct onlynested absolute · 2,049 / 2,049 tokens

v3-t3-dev-00004 · Sample 0 · Seed 36261405

Success-only

Answer A Incorrect

2,049 tokens · Ceiling hit

Read recorded reasoning
x=7, y=-3 → 3  
x=-15, y=11 → 5  
x=15, y=6 → 6  
x=14, y=7 → 6  

Test A:  
x=7, y=-3:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(7-2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(5-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(3-7)-6) = abs(4-6) = 2  
abs(abs(abs(abs(-3-7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(-10-6)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(-16-6)-4)-3) = abs(-22-4)-3 = abs(-26)-3 = 26-3 = 23  
Total: 2 + 23 = 25 → not 3 → fail

Test B:  
x=7, y=-3:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(7+2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(9-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(1-7)-6) = abs(6-6) = 0  
abs(abs(abs(abs(-3-7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(-10-6)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(-16-6)-4)-3) = abs(-22-4)-3 = 26-3 = 23  
Total: 0 + 23 = 23 → not 3 → fail

Test C:  
x=7, y=-3:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(7-2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(5-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(3-7)-6) = abs(4-6) = 2  
abs(abs(abs(abs(-3+7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(4-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(-2-4)-3) = abs(-6-3) = 9  
Total: 2 + 9 = 11 → not 3 → fail

Test D:  
x=7, y=-3:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(7+2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(9-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(1-7)-6) = abs(6-6) = 0  
abs(abs(abs(abs(-3+7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(4-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(-2-4)-3) = abs(-6-3) = 9  
Total: 0 + 9 = 9 → not 3 → fail

All candidates fail? But problem says "only one" satisfies every pair.

Wait — recheck the first example: x=7, y=-3 → 3

Try to reverse engineer.

Try candidate A again, more carefully:

x=7, y=-3  
x-2 = 5  
abs(5-8)=3  
abs(3-7)=4  
abs(4-6)=2  

y-7 = -10  
abs(-10-6)=16  
abs(16-4)=12  
abs(12-3)=9 → too big

Wait — maybe I misread the structure.

All expressions are of form:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(x ± a) - b) - c) - d) + same for y with similar constants

Try to find expression that gives 3 for (7,-3)

Try candidate D:  
x=7+2=9 → abs(9-8)=1 → abs(1-7)=6 → abs(6-6)=0 → abs(0-6)=6? Wait no:

Wait expression D:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(x+2)-8)-7)-6) →  
x=7: x+2=9 → abs(9-8)=1 → abs(1-7)=6 → abs(6-6)=0

y=-3: y+7=4 → abs(4-6)=2 → abs(2-4)=2 → abs(2-3)=1

Wait! I made a mistake earlier — the y part is:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(y+7)-6)-4)-3)

y=-3 → y+7=4  
abs(4-6)=2  
abs(2-4)=2  
abs(2-3)=1 → not 1, wait: abs(2-4)=2, then abs(2-3)=1 → total = 0 + 1 = 1 → not 3

Still not 3.

Wait — maybe I misread the expression.

Let me write it again:

A: abs(abs(abs(abs(x-2)-8)-7)-6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y-7)-6)-4)-3)

B: abs(abs(abs(abs(x+2)-8)-7)-6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y-7)-6)-4)-3)

C: abs(abs(abs(abs(x-2)-8)-7)-6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y+7)-6)-4)-3)

D: abs(abs(abs(abs(x+2)-8)-7)-6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y+7)-6)-4)-3)

Try A with x=7, y=-3:

x-2 = 5  
abs(5-8)=3  
abs(3-7)=4  
abs(4-6)=2

y-7 = -10  
abs(-10-6)=16  
abs(16-4)=12  
abs(12-3)=9  
Sum: 2+9=11 → no

Try B:  
x=7: x+2=9 → abs(9-8)=1 → abs(1-7)=6 → abs(6-6)=0  
y=-3: y-7=-10 → abs(-10-6)=16 → abs(16-4)=12 → abs(12-3)=9 → sum=0+9=9 → no

C:  
x=7: x-2=5 → abs(5-8)=3 → abs(3-7)=4 → abs(4-6)=2  
y=-3: y+7=4 → abs(4-6)=2 → abs(2-4)=2 → abs(2-3)=1 → sum=2+1=3 → YES!

Now check second pair: x=-15, y=11 → should be 5

C:  
x=-15: x-2 = -17  
abs(-17-8)=25  
abs(25-7)=18  
abs(18-6)=12  
→ 12

y=11: y+7=18  
abs(18-6)=12  
abs(12-4)=8  
abs(8-3)=5  
→ 5  
Sum: 12+5=17 → not 5 → fail

Wait — no.

Wait — the expression is:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(x-2)-8)-7)-6) → so nested abs

x=-15:  
x-2 = -17  
abs(-17) = 17  
17 - 8 = 9 → abs(9)=9  
9 - 7 = 2 → abs(2)=2  
2 - 6 = -4 → abs(-4)=4  
→ 4

y=11: y+7=18  
abs(18-6)=12  
abs(12-4)=8  
abs(8-3)=5  
→ 5  
Sum: 4+5=9 → not 5 → fail

No.

Try D: x=7, y=-3

x=7: x+2=9 → abs(9-8)=1 → abs(1-7)=6 → abs(6-6)=0  
y=-3: y+7=4 → abs(4-6)=2 → abs(2-4)=2 → abs(2-3)=1 → sum=0+1=1 → not 3

No.

Try B with x=7, y=-3:  
x=7: x+2=9 → abs(9-8)=1 → abs(1-7)=6 → abs(6-6)=0  
y=-3: y-7=-10 → abs(-10-6)=16 → abs(16-4)=12 → abs(12-3)=9 → sum=0+9=9 → no

A: x=7,y=-3 → x part: 2, y part: y-7=-10 → abs(-10-6)=16 → abs(16-4)=12 → abs(12-3)=9 → sum=11 → no

Wait — perhaps I made a mistake in the y part.

Let’s redefine the structure.

All expressions have the form:  
outer: abs( ... )  
four levels: | | | | val - c | - d | - e | - f |

So for x: | | | | x ± a | - b | - c | - d | - e |

For each, compute step by
Token penalty

Answer B Correct

2,049 tokens · Ceiling hit

Read recorded reasoning
x=7, y=-3 → 3  
x=-15, y=11 → 5  
x=15, y=6 → 6  
x=14, y=7 → 6  

Test A:  
x=7, y=-3:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(7-2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(5-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(3-7)-6) = abs(4-6) = 2  
abs(abs(abs(abs(-3-7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(-10-6)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(16-6)-4)-3) = abs(10-4)-3 = 6-3 = 3  
Total: 2+3 = 5 → should be 3 → mismatch  

Fail A.

Test B:  
x=7, y=-3:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(7+2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(9-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(1-7)-6) = abs(6-6) = 0  
abs(abs(abs(abs(-3-7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(-10-6)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(16-6)-4)-3) = abs(10-4)-3 = 6-3 = 3  
Total: 0+3 = 3 → good  

x=-15, y=11:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(-15+2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(-13-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(-21-7)-6) = abs(-28-6) = 34  
Wait — too large. Let's step carefully:  
abs(-15+2) = 13  
abs(13-8)=5  
abs(5-7)=2  
abs(2-6)=4  
→ first part: 4  

y=11:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(11-7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(4-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(2-4)-3) = abs(2-3)=1  
Total: 4+1 = 5 → good  

x=15, y=6:  
x part: abs(abs(abs(abs(15+2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(17-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(9-7)-6)=abs(2-6)=4  
y part: abs(abs(abs(abs(6-7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(-1-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(7-4)-3)=abs(3-3)=0  
Total: 4+0=4 → should be 6 → mismatch  

Fail B.

Test C:  
x=7, y=-3:  
x part: abs(abs(abs(abs(7-2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(5-8)-7)-6)=abs(abs(3-7)-6)=abs(4-6)=2  
y part: abs(abs(abs(abs(-3+7)-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(abs(4-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(2-4)-3)=abs(2-3)=1  
Total: 2+1=3 → good  

x=-15, y=11:  
x part: same as A: abs(abs(abs(abs(-15-2)-8)-7)-6) = abs(abs(abs(-17-8)-7)-6)=abs(abs(-25-7)-6)=abs(-32-6)=38 → too big  
Wait: step by step:  
x=-15: abs(-15-2)=17  
abs(17-8)=9  
abs(9-7)=2  
abs(2-6)=4 → x part = 4  

y=11: abs(abs(abs(abs(11+7)-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(abs(18-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(12-4)-3)=abs(8-3)=5  
Total: 4+5=9 → should be 5 → mismatch  

Fail C.

Test D:  
x=7, y=-3:  
x: abs(abs(abs(abs(7+2)-8)-7)-6)=abs(abs(abs(9-8)-7)-6)=abs(abs(1-7)-6)=abs(6-6)=0  
y: abs(abs(abs(abs(-3+7)-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(abs(4-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(2-4)-3)=abs(2-3)=1  
Total: 0+1=1 → should be 3 → mismatch  

Fail D.

All fail? But must have one correct.

Wait — recheck B.

x=15, y=6 → should be 6  
B:  
x=15: abs(abs(abs(abs(15+2)-8)-7)-6)  
17-8=9 → 9-7=2 → 2-6 = -4 → abs=4  
y=6: abs(abs(abs(abs(6-7)-6)-4)-3) = abs(abs(abs(-1-6)-4)-3)=abs(abs(7-4)-3)=abs(3-3)=0  
4+0=4 ≠ 6 → fail

Wait — perhaps I miscalculated the pattern.

Look at the outputs:  
x=7,y=-3 → 3  
x=-15,y=11 → 5  
x=15,y=6 → 6  
x=14,y=7 → 6

Try to reverse-engineer.

Try A again with x=7,y=-3:

x: abs(abs(abs(abs(7-2)-8)-7)-6)  
5-8=-3 → abs=3  
3-7=-4 → abs=4  
4-7=-3 → abs=3  
3-6=-3 → abs=3 → x part = 3

y: abs(abs(abs(abs(-3-7)-6)-4)-3)  
-10-6=-16 → abs=16  
16-6=10  
10-4=6  
6-3=3 → y part =3  
Total: 3+3=6 → should be 3 → fail

Wait — earlier I messed up.

Correct step-by-step for A:

x=7:  
x-2=5  
abs(5)=5  
5-8=-3 → abs=3  
3-7=-4 → abs=4  
4-6=-2 → abs=2 → x part = 2

y=-3:  
y-7=-10 → abs=10  
10-6=4  
4-4=0  
0-3=-3 → abs=3 → y part=3  
Total: 2+3=5 → should be 3 → fail

Try B: x=7,y=-3  
x+2=9  
9-8=1  
1-7=-6 → abs=6  
6-6=0 → x part=0  
y: -3-7=-10 →10→10-6=4→4-4=0→0-3=-3→3 → y part=3  
Total: 0+3=3 → good

x=-15,y=11  
x+2=-13 → abs=13  
13-8=5  
5-7=-2 → abs=2  
2-6=-4 → abs=4 → x part=4  
y=11: 11-7=4 →4-6=-2 → abs=2 →2-4=-2 → abs=2 →2-3=-1 → abs=1 → y part=1  
Total: 4+1=5 → good

x=15,y=6  
x+2=17 →17-8=9 →9-7=2 →2-6=-4 → abs=4  
y=6: 6-7=-1 →1-6=-5 →5-4=1 →1-3=-2 → abs=2  
Total: 4+2=6 → good

x=14,y=7  
x+2=16 →16-8=8 →8-7=1 →1-6=-5 → abs=5  
y=7: 7-7=0 →0-6=-6 →6-4=2 →2-3=-1 → abs=1  
Total: 5+1=6 → good

All match!

So B works.

Earlier I made a mistake in y part of B for x=15,y=6.

Correct y part:  
abs(abs(abs(abs(y-7)-6)-4)-3)  
y=6: 6-7=-1 → abs=1  
1-6=-5 → abs=5  
5-4=1 →1-3=-2 → abs=2 → yes, 2

x part: 15+2=17 →17-8=9 →9-7=2
Inspect the task and candidate repairs

Candidate expressions

  1. abs(abs(abs(abs(x - 2) - 8) - 7) - 6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 7) - 6) - 4) - 3)
  2. abs(abs(abs(abs(x + 2) - 8) - 7) - 6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 7) - 6) - 4) - 3)
  3. abs(abs(abs(abs(x - 2) - 8) - 7) - 6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y + 7) - 6) - 4) - 3)
  4. abs(abs(abs(abs(x + 2) - 8) - 7) - 6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y + 7) - 6) - 4) - 3)

Audited target: abs(abs(abs(abs(x + 2) - 8) - 7) - 6) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 7) - 6) - 4) - 3)

Visible examples

xyOutput
7-33
-15115
1566
1476
03Control correct onlybounded affine · 1,704 / 2,049 tokens

v3-t3-dev-00001 · Sample 0 · Seed 36261105

Success-only

Answer A Correct

1,704 tokens · Within ceiling

Read recorded reasoning
x=13, y=4 → 63  
x=7, y=3 → 56  
x=2, y=9 → 61  
x=2, y=-8 → 20  

Test candidate A:  
x=13, y=4  
First part: min(32, max(0, min(35, max(0, 5*13 - 4) + 2) - 5) + 5)  
5*13 - 4 = 65 - 4 = 61 → max(0,61) = 61  
61 + 2 = 63 → min(35,63) = 35  
35 - 5 = 30 → max(0,30) = 30  
30 + 5 = 35 → min(32,35) = 32  

Second part: min(72, max(0, min(49, max(0, 7*4 - 9) + 8) - 3) + 7)  
7*4 - 9 = 28 - 9 = 19 → max(0,19) = 19  
19 + 8 = 27 → min(49,27) = 27  
27 - 3 = 24 → max(0,24) = 24  
24 + 7 = 31 → min(72,31) = 31  

Total: 32 + 31 = 63 → matches  

x=7, y=3  
First: 5*7 - 4 = 35 - 4 = 31 → max(0,31)=31 → +2 = 33 → min(35,33)=33 → -5 = 28 → +5 = 33 → min(32,33)=32  
Second: 7*3 - 9 = 21 - 9 = 12 → +8 = 20 → min(49,20)=20 → -3 = 17 → +7 = 24 → min(72,24)=24  
Total: 32 + 24 = 56 → matches  

x=2, y=9  
First: 5*2 - 4 = 10 - 4 = 6 → +2 = 8 → min(35,8)=8 → -5 = 3 → +5 = 8 → min(32,8)=8  
Second: 7*9 - 9 = 63 - 9 = 54 → +8 = 62 → min(49,62)=49 → -3 = 46 → +7 = 53 → min(72,53)=53  
Total: 8 + 53 = 61 → matches  

x=2, y=-8  
First: 5*2 - 4 = 6 → +2 = 8 → min(35,8)=8 → -5 = 3 → +5 = 8 → min(32,8)=8  
Second: 7*(-8) - 9 = -56 - 9 = -65 → max(0,-65)=0 → +8 = 8 → min(49,8)=8 → -3 = 5 → +7 = 12 → min(72,12)=12  
Total: 8 + 12 = 20 → matches  

A passes all.

Now check if any other candidate fails earlier — stop at first mismatch.

Test candidate B:  
x=13, y=4  
First part: min(32, max(0, min(35, max(0, 5*13 - 4) + 2) - 5) + 5)  
Same as A: 5*13-4=61 → +2=63 → min(35,63)=35 → -5=30 → +5=35 → min(32,35)=32  
Second part: min(72, max(0, min(49, max(0, 8*4 - 9) + 8) - 3) + 7)  
8*4 - 9 = 32 - 9 = 23 → +8 = 31 → min(49,31)=31 → -3 = 28 → +7 = 35 → min(72,35)=35  
Total: 32 + 35 = 67 ≠ 63 → fails  

B fails at first example.

C:  
x=13, y=4  
First: 6*13 - 4 = 78 - 4 = 74 → max(0,74)=74 → +2 = 76 → min(35,76)=35 → -5 = 30 → +5 = 35 → min(32,35)=32  
Second: 7*4 - 9 = 19 → +8 = 27 → min(49,27)=27 → -3 = 24 → +7 = 31 → min(72,31)=31  
Total: 32 + 31 = 63 → matches  

x=7, y=3  
First: 6*7 - 4 = 42 - 4 = 38 → +2 = 40 → min(35,40)=35 → -5 = 30 → +5 = 35 → min(32,35)=32  
Second: 7*3 - 9 = 12 → +8 = 20 → min(49,20)=20 → -3 = 17 → +7 = 24 → min(72,24)=24  
Total: 32 + 24 = 56 → matches  

x=2, y=9  
First: 6*2 - 4 = 12 - 4 = 8 → +2 = 10 → min(35,10)=10 → -5 = 5 → +5 = 10 → min(32,10)=10  
Second: 7*9 - 9 = 54 → +8 = 62 → min(49,62)=49 → -3 = 46 → +7 = 53 → min(72,53)=53  
Total: 10 + 53 = 63 ≠ 61 → fails  

C fails at x=2,y=9  

D:  
x=13, y=4  
First: 6*13 - 4 = 78 - 4 = 74 → +2 = 76 → min(35,76)=35 → -5 = 30 → +5 = 35 → min(32,35)=32  
Second: 8*4 - 9 = 32 - 9 = 23 → +8 = 31 → min(49,31)=31 → -3 = 28 → +7 = 35 → min(72,35)=35  
Total: 32 + 35 = 67 ≠ 63 → fails  

Only A passes all examples.

The correct repair is A.
Token penalty

Answer C Incorrect

2,049 tokens · Ceiling hit

Read recorded reasoning
x=13, y=4 → 63  
x=7, y=3 → 56  
x=2, y=9 → 61  
x=2, y=-8 → 20  

Test A:  
x=13, y=4  
5*x - 4 = 65 - 4 = 61 → max(0,61)=61 → +2 = 63 → min(35,63)=35 → -5 = 30 → +5 = 35 → min(32,35)=32  
8*y - 9 = 32 - 9 = 23 → max(0,23)=23 → +8 = 31 → min(49,31)=31 → -3 = 28 → +7 = 35 → min(72,35)=35  
Total: 32 + 35 = 67 → not 63 → fail  

Test B:  
x=13, y=4  
5*x - 4 = 61 → max(0,61)=61 → +2 = 63 → min(35,63)=35 → -5 = 30 → +5 = 35 → min(32,35)=32  
8*y - 9 = 32 - 9 = 23 → max(0,23)=23 → +8 = 31 → min(49,31)=31 → -3 = 28 → +7 = 35 → min(72,35)=35  
32 + 35 = 67 → not 63 → fail  

Test C:  
x=13, y=4  
6*x - 4 = 78 - 4 = 74 → max(0,74)=74 → +2 = 76 → min(35,76)=35 → -5 = 30 → +5 = 35 → min(32,35)=32  
7*y - 9 = 28 - 9 = 19 → max(0,19)=19 → +8 = 27 → min(49,27)=27 → -3 = 24 → +7 = 31 → min(72,31)=31  
32 + 31 = 63 → good  
x=7, y=3  
6*x - 4 = 42 - 4 = 38 → max(0,38)=38 → +2 = 40 → min(35,40)=35 → -5 = 30 → +5 = 35 → min(32,35)=32  
7*y - 9 = 21 - 9 = 12 → max(0,12)=12 → +8 = 20 → min(49,20)=20 → -3 = 17 → +7 = 24 → min(72,24)=24  
32 + 24 = 56 → good  
x=2, y=9  
6*x - 4 = 12 - 4 = 8 → max(0,8)=8 → +2 = 10 → min(35,10)=10 → -5 = 5 → +5 = 10 → min(32,10)=10  
7*y - 9 = 63 - 9 = 54 → max(0,54)=54 → +8 = 62 → min(49,62)=49 → -3 = 46 → +7 = 53 → min(72,53)=53  
10 + 53 = 63 → but expected 61 → fail  

Test D:  
x=13, y=4  
6*x - 4 = 74 → max=74 → +2=76 → min(35,76)=35 → -5=30 → +5=35 → min(32,35)=32  
8*y - 9 = 32 - 9 = 23 → max=23 → +8=31 → min(49,31)=31 → -3=28 → +7=35 → min(72,35)=35  
32 + 35 = 67 → not 63 → fail  

All candidates fail at least one example. Wait — did I miscalculate?

Recheck C: x=2, y=9 → expected 61  
6*x - 4 = 12 - 4 = 8 → max(0,8)=8 → +2 = 10 → min(35,10)=10 → -5 = 5 → +5 = 10 → min(32,10)=10  
7*y - 9 = 63 - 9 = 54 → max(0,54)=54 → +8 = 62 → min(49,62)=49 → -3 = 46 → +7 = 53 → min(72,53)=53  
10 + 53 = 63 → not 61 → fail  

Is there a candidate that gives 61?

Wait — maybe I misread the expressions.

Let me go back to candidate C and D — perhaps the y part is different.

Wait — in C and D, y uses 7*y or 8*y.

Try candidate C again with x=2, y=9 → output 63 → expected 61 → too high.

Try x=2, y=-8 → for all?

Try candidate A with x=2, y=-8  
5*x - 4 = 10 - 4 = 6 → max(0,6)=6 → +2 = 8 → min(35,8)=8 → -5 = 3 → +5 = 8 → min(32,8)=8  
8*y - 9 = -64 -9 = -73 → max(0,-73)=0 → +8 = 8 → min(49,8)=8 → -3 = 5 → +7 = 12 → min(72,12)=12  
8 + 12 = 20 → matches  
x=13, y=4 → earlier gave 67 → not 63 → fail  

Candidate B: x=2, y=-8  
5*x-4=6 → max(0,6)=6 → +2=8 → min(35,8)=8 → -5=3 → +5=8 → min(32,8)=8  
8*y-9 = -64-9=-73 → max(0,-73)=0 → +8=8 → min(49,8)=8 → -3=5 → +7=12 → min(72,12)=12  
8+12=20 → good  
x=13, y=4:  
5*x-4=61 → max=61 → +2=63 → min(35,63)=35 → -5=30 → +5=35 → min(32,35)=32  
8*y-9=32-9=23 → max=23 → +8=31 → min(49,31)=31 → -3=28 → +7=35 → min(72,35)=35  
32+35=67 ≠63 → fail  

Candidate D: x=2, y=-8  
6*x-4=12-4=8 → max=8 → +2=10 → min(35,10)=10 → -5=5 → +5=10 → min(32,10)=10  
8*y-9=-64-9=-73 → max=0 → +8=8 → min(49,8)=8 → -3=5 → +7=12 → min(72,12)=12  
10+12=22 → not 20 → fail  

So only candidate C and D have 7y in y part, others have 8y.

Wait — maybe I miscalculated x=2, y=9 for C.

C: x=2, y=9  
6x-4 = 12-4=8 → +2=10 → min(35,10)=10 → -5=5 → +5=10 → min(32,10)=10  
7y-9 = 63-9=54 → +8=62 → min(49,62)=49 → -3=46 → +7=53 → min(72,53)=53  
10+53=63 → expected 61 → off by 2  

What if the y part
Inspect the task and candidate repairs

Candidate expressions

  1. min(32, max(0, min(35, max(0, 5 * x - 4) + 2) - 5) + 5) + min(72, max(0, min(49, max(0, 7 * y - 9) + 8) - 3) + 7)
  2. min(32, max(0, min(35, max(0, 5 * x - 4) + 2) - 5) + 5) + min(72, max(0, min(49, max(0, 8 * y - 9) + 8) - 3) + 7)
  3. min(32, max(0, min(35, max(0, 6 * x - 4) + 2) - 5) + 5) + min(72, max(0, min(49, max(0, 7 * y - 9) + 8) - 3) + 7)
  4. min(32, max(0, min(35, max(0, 6 * x - 4) + 2) - 5) + 5) + min(72, max(0, min(49, max(0, 8 * y - 9) + 8) - 3) + 7)

Audited target: min(32, max(0, min(35, max(0, 5 * x - 4) + 2) - 5) + 5) + min(72, max(0, min(49, max(0, 7 * y - 9) + 8) - 3) + 7)

Visible examples

xyOutput
13463
7356
2961
2-820
04Both correctnested absolute · 1,094 / 2,049 tokens

v3-t3-dev-00000 · Sample 0 · Seed 36261005

Success-only

Answer A Correct

1,094 tokens · Within ceiling

Read recorded reasoning
x=-15, y=-16 → 8  
x=13, y=-3 → 7  
x=0, y=12 → 7  
x=-12, y=-1 → 6

Test A:  
x=-15, y=-16  
abs(-15 - 4) = 19  
abs(19 - 9) = 10  
abs(10 - 2) = 8  
abs(8 - 4) = 4  
→ 4  

y: abs(-16 - 5) = 21  
abs(21 - 7) = 14  
abs(14 - 8) = 6  
abs(6 - 2) = 4  
→ 4  
Total: 4 + 4 = 8 ✅

x=13, y=-3  
x: abs(13-4)=9 → 9-9=0 → 0-2=-2 → abs=2 → 2-4=-2 → abs=2  
y: abs(-3-5)=8 → 8-7=1 → 1-8=-7 → abs=7 → 7-2=5 → abs=5  
Total: 2 + 5 = 7 ✅

x=0, y=12  
x: abs(0-4)=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs=5 → 5-2=3 → 3-4=-1 → abs=1  
y: abs(12-5)=7 → 7-7=0 → 0-8=-8 → abs=8 → 8-2=6  
Total: 1 + 6 = 7 ✅

x=-12, y=-1  
x: abs(-12-4)=16 → 16-9=7 → 7-2=5 → 5-4=1 → abs=1  
y: abs(-1-5)=6 → 6-7=-1 → abs=1 → 1-8=-7 → abs=7 → 7-2=5  
Total: 1 + 5 = 6 ✅  

A passes all.

Now check if others fail.

Test B:  
x=-15, y=-16  
x: abs(-15+4)=11 → 11-9=2 → 2-2=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4  
y: same as A → 4  
Total: 4+4=8 ✅

x=13, y=-3  
x: abs(13+4)=17 → 17-9=8 → 8-2=6 → 6-4=2 → abs=2  
y: abs(-3-5)=8 → 8-7=1 → 1-8=-7 → abs=7 → 7-2=5  
Total: 2 + 5 = 7 ✅

x=0, y=12  
x: abs(0+4)=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs=5 → 5-2=3 → 3-4=-1 → abs=1  
y: abs(12-5)=7 → 7-7=0 → 0-8=-8 → abs=8 → 8-2=6  
Total: 1+6=7 ✅

x=-12, y=-1  
x: abs(-12+4)=8 → 8-9=-1 → abs=1 → 1-2=-1 → abs=1 → 1-4=-3 → abs=3  
y: same as A → 5  
Total: 3+5=8 ❌ (should be 6) → fails

B fails at x=-12, y=-1 → gives 8, expected 6 → reject.

Test C:  
x=-15, y=-16  
x: abs(-15-4)=19 → 19-9=10 → 10-2=8 → 8-4=4  
y: abs(-16+5)=11 → 11-7=4 → 4-8=-4 → abs=4 → 4-2=2  
Total: 4 + 2 = 6 ❌ (expected 8) → fail

C fails first example → reject.

Test D:  
x=-15, y=-16  
x: abs(-15+4)=11 → 11-9=2 → 2-2=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4  
y: abs(-16+5)=11 → 11-7=4 → 4-8=-4 → abs=4 → 4-2=2  
Total: 4 + 2 = 6 ❌ (expected 8) → fail

Only A passes all.

The correct repair is A.
Token penalty

Answer A Correct

2,049 tokens · Ceiling hit

Read recorded reasoning
x=-15, y=-16 → 8  
x=13, y=-3 → 7  
x=0, y=12 → 7  
x=-12, y=-1 → 6

A. abs(abs(abs(abs(x - 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)  
x=-15: abs(-15-4)=29 → abs(29-9)=20 → abs(20-2)=18 → abs(18-4)=14  
y=-16: abs(-16-5)=21 → abs(21-7)=14 → abs(14-8)=6 → abs(6-2)=4  
Sum: 14+4=18 → not 8 → fail

B. abs(abs(abs(abs(x + 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)  
x=-15: -15+4=-11 → abs(-11)=11 → 11-9=2 → 2-2=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4  
y=-16: -16-5=-21 → abs=21 → 21-7=14 → 14-8=6 → 6-2=4 → abs=4  
Sum: 4+4=8 → good  
x=13: 13+4=17 → 17-9=8 → 8-2=6 → 6-4=2 → abs=2  
y=-3: -3-5=-8 → 8 → 8-7=1 → 1-8=-7 → abs=7 → 7-2=5 → abs=5  
Sum: 2+5=7 → good  
x=0: 0+4=4 → 4-9=-5 → abs=5 → 5-2=3 → 3-4=-1 → abs=1  
y=12: 12-5=7 → 7-7=0 → 0-8=-8 → abs=8 → 8-2=6 → abs=6  
Sum: 1+6=7 → good  
x=-12: -12+4=-8 → 8 → 8-9=-1 → abs=1 → 1-2=-1 → abs=1 → 1-4=-3 → abs=3  
y=-1: -1-5=-6 → 6 → 6-7=-1 → abs=1 → 1-8=-7 → abs=7 → 7-2=5 → abs=5  
Sum: 3+5=8 → should be 6 → fail

C. abs(abs(abs(abs(x - 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y + 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)  
x=-15: -15-4=-19 → 19 → 19-9=10 → 10-2=8 → 8-4=4 → abs=4  
y=-16: -16+5=-11 → 11 → 11-7=4 → 4-8=-4 → abs=4 → 4-2=2 → abs=2  
Sum: 4+2=6 → not 8 → fail

D. abs(abs(abs(abs(x + 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y + 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)  
x=-15: -15+4=-11 → 11 → 11-9=2 → 2-2=0 → 0-4=-4 → abs=4  
y=-16: -16+5=-11 → 11 → 11-7=4 → 4-8=-4 → abs=4 → 4-2=2 → abs=2  
Sum: 4+2=6 → not 8 → fail

Only B passes first three, fails last.  
Wait: last example: x=-12, y=-1 → should be 6  
B: x=-12: -12+4=-8 → 8 → 8-9=-1 → abs=1 → 1-2=-1 → abs=1 → 1-4=-3 → abs=3  
y=-1: -1+5=4 → 4-7=-3 → abs=3 → 3-8=-5 → abs=5 → 5-2=3 → abs=3  
Sum: 3+3=6 → good

Recheck all:

B:  
x=-15, y=-16 → 4+4=8  
x=13, y=-3 → x:17→8→6→2→2 (wait: 17-9=8; 8-2=6; 6-4=2) → 2  
y=-3: -3-5=-8→8→8-7=1→1-8=-7→7→7-2=5→5 → sum=2+5=7  
x=0: 0+4=4→4-9=-5→5→5-2=3→3-4=-1→1 → y=12:12+5=17→17-7=10→10-8=2→2-2=0 → sum=1+0=1 → should be 7 → fail!

Wait: y=12: in B, y term is abs(abs(abs(abs(y-5)-7)-8)-2)  
y=12: 12-5=7 → 7-7=0 → 0-8=-8 → abs=8 → 8-2=6 → abs=6  
x=0: x+4=4 → 4-9=-5 → 5 → 5-2=3 → 3-4=-1 → abs=1  
Sum: 1+6=7 → good

x=-12: x+4=-8 → 8 → 8-9=-1 → 1 → 1-2=-1 → 1 → 1-4=-3 → 3  
y=-1: y-5=-6 → 6 → 6-7=-1 → 1 → 1-8=-7 → 7 → 7-2=5 → 5  
Sum: 3+5=8 → should be 6 → fail

Wait: in B, y term is abs(abs(abs(abs(y-5)-7)-8)-2) → y=-1 → -1-5=-6 → 6 → 6-7=-1 → 1 → 1-8=-7 → 7 → 7-2=5 → 5  
x=-12: x+4=-8 → 8 → 8-9=-1 → 1 → 1-2=-1 → 1 → 1-4=-3 → 3  
3+5=8 ≠ 6 → fail

So B fails last.

Try C again:

C: abs(abs(abs(abs(x-4)-9)-2)-4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y+5)-7)-8)-2)

x=-15: -15-4=-19 →19→19-9=10→8→8-2=6→6-4=2 → 2  
y=-16: -16+5=-11→11→11-7=4→4-8=-4→4→4-2=2 → 2  
Sum: 2+2=4 → not 8

D: x+4, y+5  
x=-15: -11→11→2→0→4  
y=-16: -11→11→4→4→2 → sum 4+2=6 → not 8

None seem to work.

Wait — perhaps a typo in reasoning.

Go back to B:  
x=-12, y=-1 → output must be 6

x=-12: x+4 = -8 → | -8 | = 8  
8 - 9 = -1 → | -1 | = 1  
1 - 2 = -1 → | -1 | = 1  
1 - 4 = -3 → | -3 | = 3

y=-1: y-5 = -6 → 6  
6 - 7 = -1 → 1  
1 - 8 = -7 → 7  
7 - 2 = 5 → 5

3+5=8 → not 6

So fails.

Try C: y term uses y+5 → y=-1 → 4 → 4-7=-3 → 3 → 3-8=-5 →5 →5-2=3 →3  
x term: x-4 = -16-4
Inspect the task and candidate repairs

Candidate expressions

  1. abs(abs(abs(abs(x - 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)
  2. abs(abs(abs(abs(x + 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)
  3. abs(abs(abs(abs(x - 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y + 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)
  4. abs(abs(abs(abs(x + 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y + 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)

Audited target: abs(abs(abs(abs(x - 4) - 9) - 2) - 4) + abs(abs(abs(abs(y - 5) - 7) - 8) - 2)

Visible examples

xyOutput
-15-168
13-37
0127
-12-16

Selection rule: the first task ID, sample and seed in each nonempty outcome cell. These retrospective illustrations do not represent typical behavior or estimate effect size. All recorded reasoning is preserved verbatim.